Screening/Halftoning - III
Attributes of AM (conventional) screening
There are four attributes of a conventional screen which must be understood
if halftoning is to be commissioned or approved. They are:
❑ dot percentage,
❑ dot shape,
❑ screen ruling,
❑ screen angle.
Dot percentage
The term ‘dot percentage’ is the means by which a fixed tonal value can
be described. In a given area, such as one of the sections of the scale , if the whole area is taken to be 100%, the dot percentage
describes the proportion of the square that is covered by black image. If,
as you would find in the highlight end of the scale, only a small part of
the square is covered by the halftone pattern, the dot percentage value for
the square will be low, perhaps five or ten per cent. Conversely, at the
shadow end of the scale the percentage coverage will be far higher, perhaps
80 or 90%. If the paper is unprinted it will have zero coverage; if
there is complete coverage the halftone value is 100%.
The dot percentage always refers to the image coverage on either the
film or the printed result. A magnifier with an enlargement of about 10
is an essential tool for checking dot percentages on film. However, if individual
dots need to be studied for shape and formation then a dot microscope
with a minimum magnification of 30 should be used. So, 10 for
dot area coverage (per cent) or 30 for individual dots.
By using a densitometer, a measuring device that calculates how much
light is absorbed by a given area of film or image, it is possible to translate
light absorption into a figure which can be expressed as an equivalent area
of halftone dot. The densitometer does not actually measure the area of a
halftone image but expresses darkness, calculated using either the Murray
Davies or the Yule Neilson equations, in terms of halftone area coverage.
It is the principal method by which halftone printing is controlled.
Dot shape
The overall shape of a halftone dot determines some of its visual and
printing characteristics. There are three main dot shapes in common use
for printing – square, elliptical and round. The reason for choosing one
shape, as opposed to another, is a combination of considerations including
the purpose of the picture, the printing process and the substrate (paper,
metal, film etc.).
Square dots are considered the most suitable for general purpose work
in that they provide a compromise between rendering fine, sharp detail
and smooth tonal transitions. However, they do suffer from the problem
that at a 50% value all four corners of a square dot link, simultaneously,
to all the four dots surrounding it. This sudden link is visible as a step in
what should be a smooth tone change.
Elliptical dots are more able to represent smoothly changing values in
the mid-tones than are square dots, because their links to the surrounding
dots do not happen in a single tone level. Across the long axis of the
ellipse the dots will join at about 30%, but the short axis will not link until
the coverage is up to 70%. The trade-off is that elliptical dots are more
troublesome to control in difficult printing conditions and can produce
visible ‘chains’ through the printed image. This is why another name for
an elliptical dot is a chain dot.
The most stable of the main dot shapes, particularly in relation to dot
gain, are the round ones. Round dots would be the natural choice for
newspaper printing because of the inherently high dot gain associated
with coldset web offset printing on newsprint. But there is a trade-off in
that it is difficult to keep detail open above 75% dot area coverage.
Screen ruling
The term ‘screen ruling’ refers to the number of halftone dots per linear
measurement of the pattern. The ruling can be expressed either as lines
per centimetre (lpc) or lines per inch (lpi). The term is a throwback to the
days when screens were made from ruled glass plates, and referred to the
number of cells per linear centimetre of the screen. A 60 lpc screen ruling
would produce 60 dot centres per linear centimetre of the image.
The screen ruling of any particular halftone can be determined by counting
the dots over a measured length, using a microscope or a tester made
specifically for the purpose. The most common type of screen ruling tester
is a small piece of film, on which is reproduced a line pattern and a scale.
By rotating the tester in contact with the halftone and noting the interference
patterns generated, the ruling frequency can be read directly from
the scale.
The decision about what screen ruling is the most appropriate for any
given job will be based upon the printing process and the materials used.
Simply stated, the finer the screen ruling, the more lines per centimetre
and the finer the detail which may be reproduced on a high-quality paper
surface. There is, however, a trade-off. The finer the screen ruling, the
more sensitive the image to dot-gain, the greater the likelihood of significant
tone changes occurring when the job is printed and the more difficult
the job to control on the press.
In any situation where the risk of the halftone dots spreading is
increased, due either to the process, as in the case of flexography, or to the
materials used, as in the case of web offset newspaper printing, a coarser
screen ruling will be chosen to minimise the effect of the dot change on
the detail and tone range of the printed image.
Screen angle
The purpose of using a halftone pattern
is to simulate various levels of grey with a system which is only capable
of reproducing one tone – usually solid black. The pattern of the screen
itself should not be readily visible to the viewer. Early in the development
of the use of halftone screens, it was recognised that the pattern of the
halftone was less noticeable and there was an improvement in the perception
of the detail of the picture when the screen pattern was angled at
45°. It is for this reason that any single ink printing, regardless of colour,
which is relying on amplitude modulated halftones for the representation
of tones, should be reproduced with the pattern at 45°.
Comments
Post a Comment